Home  ›  How to Read a Icup Drug Test

How to Read a Icup Drug Test

Written By Tuesday, 1 March 2022 Add Comment Edit

Technical analysis of a biological specimen

Drug examination
MeSH D015813

A drug test is a technical analysis of a biological specimen, for example urine, hair, blood, breath, sweat, or oral fluid/saliva—to determine the presence or absence of specified parent drugs or their metabolites. Major applications of drug testing include detection of the presence of performance enhancing steroids in sport, employers and parole/probation officers screening for drugs prohibited by constabulary (such equally cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin) and law officers testing for the presence and concentration of alcohol (ethanol) in the claret unremarkably referred to every bit BAC (blood alcohol content). BAC tests are typically administered via a breathalyzer while urinalysis is used for the vast majority of drug testing in sports and the workplace. Numerous other methods with varying degrees of accurateness, sensitivity (detection threshold/cutoff), and detection periods exist.

A drug test may also refer to a test that provides quantitative chemical analysis of an illegal drug, typically intended to assistance with responsible drug use.[1]

Detection periods [edit]

The detection windows depend upon multiple factors: drug class, amount and frequency of use, metabolic rate, torso mass, age, overall health, and urine pH. For ease of use, the detection times of metabolites have been incorporated into each parent drug. For example, heroin and cocaine tin can but exist detected for a few hours after utilise, simply their metabolites tin can be detected for several days in urine. The chart depicts the longer detection times of the metabolites.

Oral fluid or saliva testing results for the most office mimic that of claret. The simply exceptions are THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) and benzodiazepines. Oral fluid will likely detect THC from ingestion up to a maximum period of half dozen–12 hours. This continues to crusade difficulty in oral fluid detection of THC and benzodiazepines.[2]

Breath air for the most part mimics claret tests as well. Due to the very low levels of substances in the breath air, liquid chromatography—mass spectrometry has to be used to analyze the sample according to a recent publication wherein 12 analytes were investigated.

Rapid oral fluid products are non approved for use in workplace drug testing programs and are not FDA cleared. Using rapid oral fluid drug tests in the workplace is prohibited in only:[3]

  • California
  • Kansas
  • Maine
  • Minnesota
  • New York
  • Vermont

The following chart gives approximate detection periods for each substance by test type.[iv]

Approximate values for detection periods[v]
Substance Urine Hair Blood / Oral Fluid
Booze six–24 hours[vi] Note: Alcohol tests may measure ethyl glucuronide, which tin can stay in urine for up to 80 hours up to 90 days[7] 12 to 24 hours
Amphetamines (except methamphetamine) i to 4 days[8] up to 90 days 12 hours
Methamphetamine five days- up to a calendar week [9] up to ninety days 1 to 3 days[9]
MDMA (Ecstasy) three to five days upwardly to 90 days 3 to 4 days
Barbiturates (except phenobarbital) 1-4 days or 2-3 weeks upwardly to xc days 1 to 2 days
Phenobarbital 2 to 3 weeks[10] up to 90 days 4 to 7 days
Benzodiazepines Therapeutic utilize: up to 7 days. Chronic use (over 1 twelvemonth): 4 to 6 weeks upwardly to 90 days 6 to 48 hours
Cannabis Passive inhalation: up to 22 minutes**
Exceptional users: 7–ten Days
Heavy users: xxx to 100 days[11] [12] [13] 		up to 90 days[eleven] 2 to 3 days in blood, up to ii weeks in claret of heavy users[xi] However, it depends on whether actual THC or THC metabolites are existence tested for, the latter having a much longer detection time than the onetime. THC (establish in marijuana) may simply be detectable in saliva/oral fluid for 2 to 24 hours in virtually cases, though in rare cases has been detected up to 28 days after consumption.[fourteen]
Cocaine 2 to 5 days (with exceptions for heavy users who can exam positive upwards to iv/6 weeks, and individuals with certain kidney disorders) up to 90 days 2–ten days, heavy users or individuals with previous substance use 6/viii weeks
Codeine two to 3 days up to 90 days 1 to four days
Cotinine (a breakup product of nicotine) 2 to 4 days upwards to 90 days 2 to iv days
Morphine ii to four days up to 90 days one to iii days
Tricyclic antidepressants (TCA'due south) seven to 10 days Undetectable[xv] Detectable but dose human relationship not established.
LSD 1-4 days (including metabolites) up to 4 days[ commendation needed ] 2 to 4 days
Methadone 7 to x days upwardly to 90 days 24 hours
Steroids iii to 30 days
PCP iii to 7 days for single use; up to thirty days in chronic users[sixteen] upward to 90 days 1 to three days[xvi]

Types [edit]

Urine drug screen [edit]

Urine analysis is primarily used because of its low toll. Urine drug testing is one of the most mutual testing methods used. The enzyme-multiplied allowed test is the nearly ofttimes used urinalysis. Complaints take been made about the relatively high rates of false positives using this examination.[17]

Urine drug tests screen the urine for the presence of a parent drug or its metabolites. The level of drug or its metabolites is not predictive of when the drug was taken or how much the patient used.[ citation needed ]

Urine drug testing is an immunoassay based on the principle of competitive binding. Drugs which may be present in the urine specimen compete against their respective drug conjugate for binding sites on their specific antibody. During testing, a urine specimen migrates upwardly by capillary activeness. A drug, if present in the urine specimen below its cut-off concentration, will not saturate the bounden sites of its specific antibiotic. The antibiotic will and so react with the drug-protein conjugate and a visible colored line will bear witness upward in the exam line region of the specific drug strip.[ citation needed ]

A common misconception is that a drug test that is testing for a class of drugs, for case, opioids, will detect all drugs of that class. Withal, near opioid tests will non reliably detect oxycodone, oxymorphone, meperidine, or fentanyl.[eighteen] Likewise, most benzodiazepine drug tests will not reliably detect lorazepam.[19] [20] However, urine drug screens that examination for a specific drug, rather than an entire form, are oft bachelor.

When an employer requests a drug test from an employee, or a physician requests a drug exam from a patient, the employee or patient is typically instructed to go to a collection site or their dwelling house. The urine sample goes through a specified 'concatenation of custody' to ensure that it is not tampered with or invalidated through lab or employee error. The patient or employee's urine is collected at a remote location in a particularly designed secure cup, sealed with tamper-resistant tape, and sent to a testing laboratory to be screened for drugs (typically the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 5 panel). The first step at the testing site is to split the urine into ii aliquots. One aliquot is showtime screened for drugs using an analyzer that performs immunoassay as the initial screen. To ensure the specimen integrity and to detect possible adulterants, boosted parameters are tested for.[21] Some exam the properties of normal urine, such equally, urine creatinine, pH, and specific gravity. Others are intended to catch substances added to the urine to alter the test result, such as, oxidants (including bleach),[22] nitrites,[23] and gluteraldehyde.[24] If the urine screen is positive then another aliquot of the sample is used to ostend the findings by gas chromatography—mass spectrometry (GC-MS) or liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry methodology. If requested by the physician or employer, certain drugs are screened for individually; these are generally drugs part of a chemical course that are, for one of many reasons, considered more addiction-forming or of business. For instance, oxycodone and diamorphine may be tested, both sedative analgesics. If such a test is not requested specifically, the more full general exam (in the preceding instance, the test for opioids) volition detect most of the drugs of a course, but the employer or physician will not have the do good of the identity of the drug.

Employment-related examination results are relayed to a medical review office (MRO) where a medical doc reviews the results. If the result of the screen is negative, the MRO informs the employer that the employee has no detectable drug in the urine, typically inside 24 hours. However, if the test outcome of the immunoassay and GC-MS are non-negative and show a concentration level of parent drug or metabolite above the established limit, the MRO contacts the employee to determine if in that location is any legitimate reason—such as a medical treatment or prescription.[25]

On-site instant drug testing is a more than toll-efficient method of effectively detecting substance utilise amongst employees, too every bit in rehabilitation programs to monitor patient progress.[ citation needed ] These instant tests can be used for both urine and saliva testing. Although the accuracy of such tests varies with the manufacturer, some kits have rates of accurateness correlating closely with laboratory test results.[26]

Breath examination [edit]

Jiff test being used on a volunteer.

Breath examination is a widespread method for quickly determining alcohol intoxication. A breath test measures the alcohol concentration in the body by a deep-lung jiff. In that location are different instruments used for measuring the alcohol content of an private though their breath. Breathalyzer is a widely known instrument which was adult in 1954 and contained chemicals unlike other jiff-testing instruments.[27] More modernly used instruments are the infrared low-cal-absorption devices and fuel cell detectors, these two testers are microprocessor controlled meaning the operator only has to printing the start button.

To become accurate readings on a breath-testing device the individual must blow for approximately vi seconds and need to contain roughly 1.i to 1.5 liters of breath. For a breath-test to issue accurately and truly an operator must accept steps such as avoiding measuring "mouth alcohol" which is a result from regurgitation, belching, or recent intake of an alcoholic drink.[28] To avoid measuring "oral cavity booze" the operator must non let the private that'south taking the test to eat whatever materials for at least 15 minutes before the jiff exam. When pulled over for a driving violation if an individual in the U.s. refuses to take a jiff test that individual'due south driver'due south license can be suspended for a vi to 12 months time period.

Hair testing [edit]

Hair analysis to detect addictive substances has been used by courtroom systems in the U.s.a., United kingdom, Canada, and other countries worldwide. In the United States, pilus testing has been accepted in court cases as forensic evidence following the Frye Rule, the Federal Rules of Bear witness, and the Daubert Rule. As such, hair testing results are legally and scientifically recognized as admissible prove.[ citation needed ]

Although some lower courts may accept accepted hair examination bear witness, there is no controlling judicial ruling in either the federal or whatever country system declaring whatever type of hair test as reliable.

Hair testing is now recognized in both the UK and US judicial systems. There are guidelines for hair testing that have been published by the Gild of Pilus Testing (a private visitor in France) that specify the markers to be tested for and the cutoff concentrations that need to be tested. Addictive substances that can exist detected include Cannabis, Cocaine, Amphetamines and drugs new to the Uk such as Mephedrone.

Alcohol [edit]

In contrast to other drugs consumed, booze is deposited straight in the pilus. For this reason the investigation procedure looks for direct products of ethanol metabolism. The primary part of alcohol is oxidized in the homo body. This means it is released every bit water and carbon dioxide. One part of the booze reacts with fatty acids to produce esters. The sum of the concentrations of four of these fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs: ethyl myristate, ethyl palmitate, ethyl oleate and ethyl stearate) are used equally indicators of the booze consumption. The amounts establish in pilus are measured in nanograms (i nanogram equals only ane billionth of a gram), all the same with the benefit of mod technology, it is possible to discover such small amounts. In the detection of ethyl glucuronide, or EtG, testing can find amounts in picograms (one picogram equals 0.001 nanograms).

Nevertheless, there is one major divergence between nearly drugs and alcohol metabolites in the way in which they enter into the pilus: on the ane paw like other drugs FAEEs enter into the hair via the keratinocytes, the cells responsible for hair growth. These cells form the hair in the root and then grow through the skin surface taking whatever substances with them. On the other mitt, the sebaceous glands produce FAEEs in the scalp and these migrate together with the sebum forth the hair shaft (Auwärter et al., 2001, Pragst et al., 2004). Then these glands lubricate non only the role of the hair that is just growing at 0.3 mm per day on the skin surface, but as well the more mature hair growth, providing information technology with a protective layer of fat.

FAEEs (nanogram = one billionth of a gram) announced in hair in near one society of magnitude lower than (the relevant lodge of magnitude of) EtG (picogram = one trillionth of a gram). It has been technically possible to measure FAEEs since 1993, and the start written report reporting the detection of EtG in hair was done past Sachs in 1993.[29]

In practice, about hair which is sent for analysis has been cosmetically treated in some way (bleached, permed etc.). It has been proven that FAEEs are not significantly affected by such treatments (Hartwig et al., 2003a). FAEE concentrations in hair from other torso sites can exist interpreted in a similar fashion as scalp hair (Hartwig et al., 2003b).

Presumptive substance testing [edit]

Presumptive substance tests attempt to identify a suspicious substance, material or surface where traces of drugs are thought to be, instead of testing individuals through biological methods such as urine or hair testing. The examination involves mixing the suspicious fabric with a chemic in gild to trigger a color change to indicate if a drug is present. Most are now available over-the-counter for consumer use, and do not crave a lab to read results.

Benefits to this method include that the person who is suspected of drug use does not need to be confronted or aware of testing. Only a very small-scale amount of material is needed to obtain results, and can be used to examination pulverization, pills, capsules, crystals, or organic material. In that location is also the ability to observe illicit material when mixed with other non-illicit materials. The tests are used for general screening purposes, offering a generic consequence for the presence of a broad range of drugs, including Heroin, Cocaine, Methamphetamine, Amphetamine, Ecstasy/MDMA, Methadone, Ketamine, PCP, PMA, DMT, MDPV, and may detect rapidly evolving synthetic designer drugs. Split up tests for Marijuana/Hashish are too available.[ citation needed ]

There are five primary color-tests reagents used for general screening purposes. The Marquis reagent turns into a variety of colors when in the presence of different substances. Dille-Koppanyi reagent uses two chemic solutions which turns a violet-blue color in the presence of barbiturates. Duquenois-Levine reagent is a serial of chemical solutions that turn to the color of imperial when the vegetation of marijuana is added. Van Urk reagent turns blue-purple when in the presence of LSD. Scott exam'south chemical solution shows upwards as a faint bluish for cocaine base.[30]

In recent years, the utilise of presumptive test kits in the criminal justice system has come under great scrutiny due to the lack to forensic studies, questioned reliability, rendering of false positives with legal substances, and wrongful arrests.[31] [32] [33]

Saliva drug screen / Oral fluid-based drug screen [edit]

Saliva / oral fluid-based drug tests can generally detect use during the previous few days. Is better at detecting very contempo use of a substance. THC may but exist detectable for 2–24 hours in nigh cases. On site drug tests are allowed per the Department of Labor.[ citation needed ]

Detection in saliva tests begins nigh immediately upon use of the post-obit substances, and lasts for approximately the post-obit times:

  • Alcohol: six-12 h[34]
  • Marijuana: 1-24h

A disadvantage of saliva based drug testing is that it is not approved past FDA or SAMHSA for use with DOT / Federal Mandated Drug Testing.[ citation needed ] Oral fluid is not considered a bio-hazard unless there is visible blood; however, information technology should be treated with care.

Sweat drug screen [edit]

Sweat patches are attached to the pare to collect sweat over a long catamenia of time (upwardly to 14 days).[35] These are used by child protective services, parole departments, and other government institutions concerned with drug use over long periods, when urine testing is not applied.[36] There are also surface drug tests that test for the metabolite of parent drug groups in the residue of drugs left in sweat. An case of a rapid, non-invasive, sweat-based drug test is fingerprint drug screening.[37] This 10 minute fingerprint exam[38] is in employ by a variety of organisations in the UK and beyond, including inside workplaces,[39] [40] drug treatment and family safeguarding services[41] [42] at airport edge control (to detect drug mules)[43] and in mortuaries to assistance in investigations into cause of death.[44]

Blood [edit]

Drug-testing a blood sample measures whether or not a drug or a metabolite is in the trunk at a detail time. These types of tests are considered to be the virtually accurate mode of telling if a person is intoxicated. Blood drug tests are not used very often because they need specialized equipment and medically trained administrators.

Depending on how much marijuana was consumed, it tin usually exist detected in blood tests inside half-dozen hours of consumption. After six hours has passed, the concentration of marijuana in the blood decreases significantly. It more often than not disappears completely within 30 days.

Random drug testing [edit]

Can occur at any time, usually when the investigator has reason to believe that a substance is perchance being used by the bailiwick by behavior or immediately later on an employee-related incident occurs during piece of work hours. Testing protocol typically conforms to the national medical standard, candidates are given upwards to 120 minutes to reasonably produce a urine sample from the time of commencement (in some instances this time frame may be extended at the examiners discretion).

Diagnostic screening [edit]

In the case of life-threatening symptoms, unconsciousness, or bizarre behavior in an emergency situation, screening for common drugs and toxins may help observe the cause, called a toxicology test or tox screen to denote the broader expanse of possible substances across just self-administered drugs. These tests tin can also be done mail-mortem during an dissection in cases where a decease was non expected. The examination is usually done within 96 hours (4 days) afterward the desire for the test is realized. Both a urine sample and a claret sample may be tested.[45] A blood sample is routinely used to observe ethanol/methanol and ASA/paracetamol intoxication. Various panels are used for screening urine samples for common substances, due east.g. triage viii that detects amphetamines, benzodiazepines, cocaine, methadone, opiates, cannabis, barbiturates and tricyclic antidepressants.[46] Results are given in 10–fifteen min.

Similar screenings may be used to evaluate the possible use of engagement rape drugs. This is usually done on a urine sample.[45]

Optional harm reduction scheme [edit]

Drug checks/tests (also known as pill testing) are provided at some events such every bit concerts and music festivals. Attendees can voluntarily hand over a sample of whatsoever drug or drugs in their possession to be tested to bank check what the drug is and its purity. The scheme is used equally a harm reduction technique so people are more aware of what they are taking and the potential risks.[47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53]

Occupational harm reduction strategies [edit]

Drug and alcohol impairment while at work increases the risk of piece of work-place accidents and decreases productivity. Employers such as the commercial driving and airline industry may conduct random drug tests on employees with the goal of deterring utilise to improve safe.[54] There is some show that increasing the use of random drug testing in the airline manufacture reduces the percentage of people who test positive, even so, it is unclear if this subtract is associated with a corresponding decrease in fatal or non-fatal injuries, other accidents, number of days absent-minded from work.[55] It is also not clear if there are other unwanted side effects that may event from random drug and alcohol testing in the workplace.[55]

Commonly tested substances [edit]

Anabolic steroids [edit]

Anabolic steroids are used to enhance performance in sports and as they are prohibited in nearly high-level competitions drug testing is used extensively in society to enforce this prohibition. This is particularly so in individual (rather than team) sports such every bit athletics and cycling.

Methodologies [edit]

Before testing samples, the tamper-evident seal is checked for integrity. If information technology appears to have been tampered with or damaged, the laboratory rejects the sample and does not examination it.

Adjacent, the sample must exist fabricated testable. Urine and oral fluid can exist used "as is" for some tests, simply other tests require the drugs to exist extracted from urine. Strands of hair, patches, and blood must be prepared before testing. Hair is done in order to eliminate second-hand sources of drugs on the surface of the hair, then the keratin is broken downwards using enzymes. Blood plasma may need to be separated by centrifuge from blood cells prior to testing. Sweat patches are opened and the sweat drove component is removed and soaked in a solvent to dissolve whatsoever drugs present.

Laboratory-based drug testing is washed in 2 steps. The first step is the screening test, which is an immunoassay based examination applied to all samples. The second step, known as the confirmation test, is usually undertaken by a laboratory using highly specific chromatographic techniques and only applied to samples that test positive during the screening test.[56] Screening tests are usually done by immunoassay (EMIT, ELISA, and RIA are the about mutual). A "dipstick" drug testing method which could provide screening test capabilities to field investigators has been adult at the University of Illinois.[57]

After a suspected positive sample is detected during screening, the sample is tested using a confirmation test. Samples that are negative on the screening test are discarded and reported as negative. The confirmation exam in near laboratories (and all SAMHSA certified labs) is performed using mass spectrometry, and is precise merely expensive. Simulated positive samples from the screening test will almost always be negative on the confirmation exam. Samples testing positive during both screening and confirmation tests are reported as positive to the entity that ordered the test. Virtually laboratories salve positive samples for some period of months or years in the consequence of a disputed result or lawsuit. For workplace drug testing, a positive event is mostly non confirmed without a review by a Medical Review Officer who will normally interview the subject of the drug test.

Urine drug testing [edit]

Urine drug exam kits are bachelor as on-site tests, or laboratory analysis. Urinalysis is the most mutual test type and used by federally mandated drug testing programs and is considered the Gold Standard of drug testing. Urine based tests have been upheld in almost courts for more than xxx years. Withal, urinalysis conducted past the Department of Defence force has been challenged for reliability of testing the metabolite of cocaine. There are two associated metabolites of cocaine, benzoylecgonine (BZ) and ecgonine methyl ester (EME), the outset (BZ) is created by the presence of cocaine in an aqueous solution with a pH greater than seven.0, while the second (EME) results from the actual human metabolic process. The presence of EME confirms actual ingestion of cocaine by a human being, while the presence of BZ is indicative only. BZ without EME is show of sample contagion, however, the United states Department of Defense has chosen not to test for EME in its urinalysis program.[58] [ relevant? ]

A number of different analyses (divers every bit the unknown substance being tested for) are available on Urine Drug Screens.

Spray drug testing [edit]

Spray (sweat) drug exam kits are non-invasive. Information technology is a unproblematic process to collect the required specimen, no bath is needed, no laboratory is required for analysis, and the tests themselves are difficult to manipulate and relatively tamper-resistant. The detection window is long and can find contempo drug use within several hours.

There are also some disadvantages to spray or sweat testing. In that location is non much variety in these drug tests, just a express number of drugs can be detected, prices tend to be higher, and inconclusive results can exist produced by variations in sweat production rates in donors. They besides have a relatively long specimen collection catamenia and are more vulnerable to contamination than other common forms of testing.[35]

Pilus drug testing [edit]

Pilus drug testing is a method that tin detect drug use over a much longer period of time,[59] and is often used for highly safety-disquisitional positions where in that location is nil tolerance of illegal drug use.[60] Standard hair follicle screen covers a menses of 30 to ninety days. The growth of caput hair is normally at the rate of 0.five inches per month.[61] The pilus sample is cutting shut to the scalp and 80 to 120 strands of pilus are needed for the exam. In the absence of hair on the head, body hair tin be used as an acceptable substitute.[59] This includes facial hair, the underarms, arms, and legs or even pubic hair. Because body hair grows at a different rate than head hair, the timeframe changes, with scientists estimating that drug use can be detected in body hair for up to 12 months. Currently, nearly entities that use pilus testing accept prescribed consequences for individuals removing hair to avoid a hair drug test.

The claim that a hair test cannot be tampered with has been shown to be debatable. One study has shown that THC does not readily deposit inside epithelial cells so it is possible for cosmetic and other forms of adulteration to reduce the amount of testable cannabinoids within a hair sample.[29]

Legality, ideals and politics [edit]

The results of federally mandating drug testing were similar to the effects of simply extending to the trucking industry the right to perform drug tests, and it has been argued that the latter approach would have been as effective at lower cost.[62]

Psychologist Tony Buon has criticized the use of workplace drug testing on a number of grounds, including:

  1. Flawed Technology: The real earth functioning of testing is much lower than that claimed by its promoters. Buon suggest that tests are probably adequate for rehabilitation and handling situations, perhaps adequate for pre-employment situations, but not for dismissing employees.
  2. Ethical Issues: Because of the fairly uncomplicated ways that an employee can invalidate the test, drug testing must exist strictly monitored. This means that the specimen must exist observed leaving the body. Many legal objections currently being raised in the courts about drug testing are pointing to legal requirements of prior find, consent, due procedure, and cause.[63] [64]
  3. Wrong focus: As has been shown with Employee Assist Programs, the focus of management concern should exist on work performance decline. Buon suggests effective management practices are an infinitely improve approach to managing workplace alcohol and other drug issues.[65]

Tony Buon has as well reported by the CIPD equally stating that "drug testing captures the stupid—experienced drug users know how to beat the tests".[66]

From a penological standpoint, ane purpose of drug testing is to help classify the people taking the drug exam within risk groups and so that those who pose more of a danger to the public can be incapacitated through incarceration or other restrictions on liberty. Thus, the drug testing serves a crime control purpose even if in that location is no expectation of rehabilitating the drug user through treatment, deterring drug use through sanctions, or sending a message that drug use is a deviant behavior that will not be tolerated.[67]

United Kingdom [edit]

A study in 2004 by the Independent Inquiry into Drug Testing at Work found that attempts past employers to force employees to take drug tests could potentially be challenged as a violation of privacy under the Human being Rights Act 1998 and Commodity 8 of the European Convention of Human being Rights.[68] Withal, this does not apply to industries where drug testing is a matter of personal and public safety or security rather than productivity.

United States [edit]

In consultation with Dr. Carlton Turner, President Ronald Reagan issued Executive Order 12564. In doing and so, he instituted mandatory drug-testing for all safety-sensitive executive-level and civil-service Federal employees. This was challenged in the courts past the National Treasury Employees Union. In 1988, this challenge was considered by the US Supreme Court.[69] A similar challenge resulted in the Courtroom extending the drug-free workplace concept to the private sector.[70] These decisions were and then incorporated into the White House Drug Control Strategy directive issued by President George H.W. Bush-league in 1989.[71] All defendants serving on federal probation or federal supervised release are required to submit to at least 3 drug tests. Failing a drug test tin exist construed as possession of a controlled substance, resulting in mandatory revocation and imprisonment.[72]

There accept been inconsistent evaluation results equally to whether continued pretrial drug testing has beneficial effects.[73]

Testing positive tin atomic number 82 to bail non being granted, or if bail has already been granted, to bond revocation or other sanctions. Arizona also adopted a law in 1987 authorizing mandatory drug testing of felony arrestees for the purpose of informing the pretrial release decision, and the District of Columbia has had a like law since the 1970s. It has been argued that one of the problems with such testing is that there is often not enough time between the arrest and the bail decision to confirm positive results using GC/MS technology. Information technology has also been argued that such testing potentially implicates the Fifth Subpoena privilege confronting cocky-incrimination, the right to due procedure (including the prohibition against gathering bear witness in a manner that shocks the censor or constitutes outrageous government conduct), and the prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures contained in the Fourth Amendment.[74]

According to Henriksson, the anti-drug appeals of the Reagan administration "created an environment in which many employers felt compelled to implement drug testing programs considering failure to do so might be perceived every bit condoning drug use. This fear was hands exploited by aggressive marketing and sales forces, who ofttimes overstated the value of testing and painted a bleak picture of the consequences of failing to use the drug testing production or service existence offered."[75] On March 10, 1986, the Committee on Organized Crime asked all U.South. companies to examination employees for drug use. By 1987, nearly 25% of the Fortune 500 companies used drug tests.[76]

According to an uncontrolled self-report study done by DATIA and Society for Human being Resource Management in 2012 (sample of six,000 randomly selected human being resource professionals), man resource professionals reported the following results after implementing a drug testing program: xix% of companies reported a subjective increment in employee productivity, sixteen% reported a decrease in employee turnover (eight% reported an increase), and unspecified percentages reported decreases in absenteeism and improvement of workers' compensation incidence rates.[77]

Co-ordinate to U.s. Chamber of Commerce 70% of all illicit drug users are employed.[78] Some industries have high rates of employee drug utilise such as structure (12.8%), repair (11.1%), and hospitality (seven.9-xvi.3%).[79]

Australia [edit]

A person conducting a concern or undertaking (PCBU—the new term that includes employers) has duties nether the piece of work wellness and condom (WHS) legislation to ensure a worker affected by alcohol or other drugs does not identify themselves or other persons at risk of injury while at work. Workplace policies and prevention programs tin help alter the norms and culture around substance use.[ commendation needed ]

All organisations—big and small-scale—tin can benefit from an agreed policy on alcohol and drug misuse that applies to all workers. Such a policy should form part of an organisations overall health and condom management organisation. PCBUs are encouraged to plant a policy and procedure, in consultation with workers, to constructively manage alcohol and other drug related hazards in their workplace. A comprehensive workplace alcohol and other drug policy should apply to everyone in the workplace and include prevention, education, counselling and rehabilitation arrangements. In add-on, the roles and responsibilities of managers and supervisors should be clearly outlined.[ citation needed ]

All Australian workplace drug testing must comply with Australian standard AS/NZS4308:2008.[ citation needed ]

In Victoria, roadside saliva tests detect drugs that contain:[80]

  • THC (Delta-ix tetrahydrocannabinol), the active component in cannabis.
  • methamphetamine, as well known as "ice", "crystal" and "creepo".
  • MDMA (Methylenedioxymethamphetamine), which is known as ecstasy.

In Feb 2022 a New South Wales magistrate "acquitted a human being who tested positive for cannabis". He had been arrested and charged after testing positive during a roadside drug examination, despite non having smoked for nine days. He was relying on advice previously given to him by constabulary.[81]

Refusal [edit]

In the United States federal criminal system, refusing to take a drug examination triggers an automatic revocation of probation or supervised release.[82] [83]

In Victoria, Australia the driver of the car has the option to refuse the drug test. Refusing to undergo a drug test or refusing to undergo a secondary drug test afterward the starting time one, triggers an automatic interruption and disqualification for a period of two years and a fine of AUD$grand. The 2d refusal triggers an automatic suspension and disqualification for a period of four years and an even larger fine.

Historical cases [edit]

  • In 1993 Meritorious Marine Sergeant Steve Steinmetz refused to submit to further drug screening on the grounds that information technology violated his 4th and 5th Amendment Rights against unwarranted search and self-incrimination. He was court-martialed and given a Bad Conduct Discharge from the Usa Marine Corps in 1994 for refusing to obey a "lawful social club". He was threatened with forced medical procedures to obtain a sample if he was imprisoned. Said Marine stated, "That won't happen". He was discharged without beingness imprisoned.[ citation needed ]
  • In 2000, an Australian Mining Company Southward Blackwater Coal Ltd with 400 employees, imposed drug-testing procedures, and the trade unions brash their members to turn down to take the tests, partly because a positive outcome does not necessarily signal nowadays harm; the workers were stood-down by the company without pay for a calendar week.[84]
  • In 2003, sixteen members of the Chicago White Sox considered refusing to accept a drug test, in hopes of making steroid testing mandatory.[85]
  • In 2006, Levy County, Florida, volunteer librarians resigned en masse rather than take drug tests.[86]
  • In 2010, Iranian super heavyweight course weightlifters refused to submit to a drug exam authorized by the Iran Weightlifting League.[87]

Come across as well [edit]

  • Cannabis drug tests
  • Detoxification
  • Drug checking
  • Drug-Costless Workplace Act of 1988
  • Equine drug testing
  • Forensic toxicology
  • Lacing (drugs)
  • Presumptive and confirmatory tests
  • Reagent testing
  • Schoolhouse district drug policies
  • Urinalysis
  • Occupational health concerns of cannabis use

References [edit]

  1. ^ "I spent my weekend testing drugs at a festival". The Independent. July 25, 2016. Retrieved May 18, 2017.
  2. ^ U.Due south. Section of Transportation: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (DOT HS 810 704). Airplane pilot Test of New Roadside Survey Methodology for Impaired Driving. Jan, 2007.
  3. ^ "Drug Testing - Country by State Legal Status" (PDF). Alere Toxicology. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 25, 2014. Retrieved 2013-02-21 .
  4. ^ "Drugs of Abuse Reference Guide," Elevation BioLabs, Retrieved online April 11, 2007.
  5. ^ "Heroin Test - Heroin Drug Test - Testing Blood - Urine Tests". TheGoodDrugsGuide . Retrieved May 11, 2016.
  6. ^ Erowid Alcohol Vault : Drug Testing. Erowid.org. Retrieved on August 7, 2011.
  7. ^ "Hair Alcohol Testing (EtG)". Psychemedics.com. Retrieved on June 23, 2016.
  8. ^ Erowid Amphetamine Vault : Drug Testing. Erowid.org. Retrieved on September five, 2013.
  9. ^ a b Erowid Methamphetamine Vault : Drug Testing. Erowid.org. Retrieved on September v, 2013.
  10. ^ Erowid Barbiturates Vault : Drug Testing. Erowid.org. Retrieved on August vii, 2011.
  11. ^ a b c Erowid Cannabis (Marijuana) Vault : Drug Testing. Erowid.org (2010-02-28). Retrieved on August seven, 2011.
  12. ^ Marijuana Detection Time Shorter Than Previously Assumed. norml.org (2006-02-23). Retrieved on March 13, 2012.
  13. ^ Susan Squibb (March 9, 2016). "How long does weed stay in your system?". The Cannabist. Archived from the original on March 11, 2016. Retrieved May 25, 2016.
  14. ^ Lee, Dayong (2013). "Current Knowledge on Cannabinoids in Oral Fluid". Drug Testing and Analysis. vi (i–2): 88–111. doi:ten.1002/dta.1514. PMC4532432. PMID 23983217.
  15. ^ "2D6O - Clinical: Cytochrome P450 2D6 Genotype, Saliva". mayomedicallaboratories.com.
  16. ^ a b Erowid PCP Vault : Drug Testing. Erowid.org (2009-11-03). Retrieved on August 7, 2011.
  17. ^ Abadinsky, H. (2014). Drug apply and corruption: A comprehensive introduction. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. pp. 163–165. ISBN9781285070278.
  18. ^ Pesce, Amadeo; West, Cameron; Egan-Urban center, Kathy; Strickland, Jennifer (July 2012). "Interpretation of Urine Drug Testing in Pain Patients". Pain Medicine. 13 (seven): 868–885. doi:x.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01350.x. ISSN 1526-2375. PMID 22494459.
  19. ^ Shaw, Leslie Thousand. (2001). The Clinical Toxicology Laboratory: Contemporary Do of Poisoning Evaluation. Amer. Assoc. for Clinical Chemistry. p. 216. ISBN9781890883539.
  20. ^ Ries, Richard K.; Miller, Shannon C.; Fiellin, David A. (2009). Principles of Addiction Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 301. ISBN9780781774772.
  21. ^ "How adulteration works". Oct eleven, 2021.
  22. ^ Aydoğdu, M.; Akgür, S. A. (2021). "Urine drug-testing tampering approaches: Turkish probationers". Medicine, Science, and the Police force. 61 (one): 6–13. doi:x.1177/0025802420956453. ISSN 0025-8024. PMID 32924786. S2CID 221720183.
  23. ^ Steuer, A. E.; Kamber, D.; Kraemer, T. (2019). "Evaluation of endogenous urinary biomarkers for indirect detection of urine cariosity attempts by v different chemic adulterants in mass spectrometry methods". Drug Testing and Analysis. 11 (five): 638–648. doi:10.1002/dta.2539. PMID 30408836. S2CID 53241111.
  24. ^ Fu, S. (2016). "Adulterants in Urine Drug Testing". Advances in Clinical Chemical science. 76: 123–163. doi:10.1016/bs.acc.2016.05.003. ISBN9780128046876. PMID 27645818.
  25. ^ "Medical Review Officer Manual" (PDF). SAMSHA Gov. Archived from the original (PDF) on Feb 15, 2013.
  26. ^ Article in Confirm Biosciences
  27. ^ Saferstein, R. (2013). Forensic science: From the crime scene to the offense lab. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Teaching Inc. pp. 295–300. ISBN978-0131391871.
  28. ^ Saferstein, R. (2013). Forensic science: From the offense scene to the crime lab. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education. pp. 295–303. ISBN978-0131391871.
  29. ^ a b Pascal Kintz (Baronial thirty, 2006). Analytical and practical aspects of drug testing in hair. CRC Press. pp. 305–. ISBN978-0-8493-6450-i.
  30. ^ Saferstein, Richard (2013). Forensic science:From the crime scene to the offense lab. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Educational activity Inc. p. 271. ISBN978-0131391871.
  31. ^ Gabrielson, Ryan; Sanders, Topher (December sixteen, 2016). "How a $2 Roadside Drug Test Sends Innocent People to Jail". The New York Times Mag. Archived from the original on December 6, 2016.
  32. ^ Gabrielson, Ryan; Sanders, Topher (July 7, 2016). "Tens of thousands of people every twelvemonth are sent to jail based on the results of a $2 roadside drug test". ProPublica.org. Archived from the original on March 16, 2019. Retrieved March 16, 2019.
  33. ^ Kelly, John (2008). "False Positives Equal Simulated Justice" (PDF). California Chaser General. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 16, 2019. Retrieved March 16, 2019.
  34. ^ http://www.erowid.org/psychoactives/testing/testing_info1.shtml Drug Testing Basics
  35. ^ a b "Drug Exam". aboutdrugtesting.org. 2007. Archived from the original on October eleven, 2007.
  36. ^ "Federal Court Drug-Testing Device Under Burn down, PharmChem Sweat Patch May Be "Too Practiced"". January 5, 2001.
  37. ^ "Immigration The Haze: Intelligent Fingerprinting Drug Screening with Dr. Paul Yates _049 on Apple Podcasts". Apple Podcasts . Retrieved Apr 14, 2021.
  38. ^ Moody, Oliver. "New device tin can sniff out the weekend drug-takers". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved April xiv, 2021.
  39. ^ "Keepmoat Homes deploys fingerprint drug testing for plant operator Health & Rubber". BDC Magazine. February 25, 2021. Retrieved April fourteen, 2021.
  40. ^ "Vantec Europe introduces Intelligent Fingerprinting drug tests". world wide web.commercialfleet.org . Retrieved April 14, 2021.
  41. ^ "Introducing intelligent fingerprinting – better, safer drug testing | Change Grow Live". www.changegrowlive.org . Retrieved April 14, 2021.
  42. ^ Attias, Julia (September 3, 2019). "'Revolutionary' drug test tin can tell if you're intoxicated from simply a fingerprint". mirror . Retrieved Apr 14, 2021.
  43. ^ "Fingerprint-based drug test accelerates identification of drug mules". International Airdrome Review . Retrieved April xiv, 2021.
  44. ^ SelectScience. "Revolutionary Fingertip Drug Exam Aids Forensic Toxicology | SelectScience". www.selectscience.net . Retrieved April 14, 2021.
  45. ^ a b WebMD --> Toxicology Tests Author: Jeannette Curtis. Master Medical Reviewer: Kathleen Romito, Doctor—Family Medicine. Specialist Medical Reviewer: R. Steven Tharratt, Doctor, MPVM, FACP, FCCP—Pulmonology, Critical Care, Medical Toxicology. Last Updated: May 9, 2008
  46. ^ Sixteen devices for the detection of drugs of abuse in urine Archived August xi, 2011, at the Wayback Car MHRA Report No. MHRA 03078. Report Date: October 2003
  47. ^ Moodie, Kim (December 18, 2019). "Govt to back enquiry on drug-checking programmes at music festivals". New Zealand Herald . Retrieved Dec 23, 2019.
  48. ^ "Half dozen UK music festivals are to allow drug testing including Reading and Leeds". BBC newsbeat. May 22, 2017. Retrieved December 23, 2019.
  49. ^ "Thousands of people utilize drug-testing facilities at UK music festivals". BBC News. September iii, 2018. Retrieved December 23, 2019.
  50. ^ Zhou, Naaman (April 29, 2018). "First ever pill-testing trial at Australian music festival". The Guardian . Retrieved December 23, 2019.
  51. ^ Corsetti, Stephanie (May half dozen, 2018). "Drug testing at festivals given thumbs up by young music fans". ABC News . Retrieved Dec 23, 2019.
  52. ^ Zhuang, Yan (January iv, 2019). "Pill testing: What drug tests and festivals do, and why". Stuff . Retrieved Dec 23, 2019.
  53. ^ "Music festivals: What can be done to stop drug deaths?". BBC News. August 30, 2019. Retrieved December 23, 2019.
  54. ^ Akanbi, Maxwell O.; Iroz, Cassandra B.; O'Dwyer, Linda C.; Rivera, Adovich Southward.; McHugh, Megan Colleen (January 2020). "A systematic review of the effectiveness of employer-led interventions for drug misuse". Periodical of Occupational Health. 62 (1): e12133. doi:10.1002/1348-9585.12133. ISSN 1348-9585. PMC7293184. PMID 32533807.
  55. ^ a b Els, Charl; Jackson, Tanya D.; Milen, Mathew T.; Kunyk, Diane; Wyatt, Graeme; Sowah, Daniel; Hagtvedt, Reidar; Deibert, Danika; Straube, Sebastian (December 27, 2020). "Random drug and alcohol testing for preventing injury in workers". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020 (12): CD012921. doi:ten.1002/14651858.CD012921.pub2. ISSN 1469-493X. PMC8130990. PMID 33368213.
  56. ^ "Principles of Drug Testing Engineering science," Drug Tests Direct, Retrieved online Dec 07, 2012.
  57. ^ Jim Barlow (November 2006). "A Little Dab Will Exercise It". LASNews. University of Illinois. Archived from the original on January 29, 2007. Retrieved November 29, 2006.
  58. ^ Maume, Chris (November 29, 2013). "Books of the yr 2013: Sport". The Independent. London.
  59. ^ a b "How Did I Pass My Drug Test - Personal Story". Best Style To Beat out Whatsoever Drug Test!.
  60. ^ Hatala, John Due west. (June 2003). "The Feasibility of Testing Hair for Illicit Drug Utilise in the United states Marine Corps" (PDF). Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School: 2. hdl:10945/976 . Retrieved May 7, 2009.
  61. ^ Puiu, Tibi (Baronial 23, 2018). "How fast pilus grows, and other hairy science". world wide web.zmescience.com. ZME Science. Retrieved September 28, 2018. The hair on your head grows well-nigh 6 inches a year.
  62. ^ Mireille Jacobson (April 2003). "Drug Testing in the Trucking Manufacture: The Effect on Highway Safe". Journal of Law and Economics. 46 (1): 131–156. CiteSeerX10.ane.1.489.2439. doi:10.1086/345584. S2CID 38999582.
  63. ^ Buon, Tony (June 1996). "Booze, drug and other problems in academia". Drugs in Guild.
  64. ^ Brockett, James (Nov 2006). "Does testing work?". People Direction. 12 (23): 13.
  65. ^ Buon, Y.; Compton, B. (1994). "The Development of Alcohol and Other Drug Programs in the Workplace". In Rock, R. J. (ed.). Readings in Human Resources Management. Vol. two. Brisbane: John Wiley. pp. 240–252.
  66. ^ "Does testing work? - People Management Magazine Online". cipd.co.great britain.
  67. ^ Feeley, Malcolm M.; Simon, Jonathan (1992). "The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications". Criminology. 30 (4): 449–474. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.10.
  68. ^ Independent Inquiry into Drug Testing at Piece of work. "Drug testing in the workplace: Summary conclusions of the Contained Inquiry into Drug Testing at Work". Archived from the original on September 28, 2007. Retrieved January 17, 2008.
  69. ^ . National Treasury Employees Union five. von Raab. 86-1879, United states of america Supreme Court, 1989.
  70. ^ Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Assoc. 87-15555. Usa Supreme Court, 1989
  71. ^ Miller, NS; Giannini, AJ; Gold, MS; Philomena, JA (1990). "Drug testing: medical, legal, and ethical issues". Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 7 (4): 239–44. doi:ten.1016/0740-5472(90)90047-T. PMID 2290186.
  72. ^ 18 U.Due south.C. § 3563, 18 UsaC. § 3583
  73. ^ Visher, Christy A. (May 1, 1992). "Pretrial Drug Testing: Panacea or Pandora'southward Box?". The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 521 (i): 112–131. doi:10.1177/0002716292521001007. JSTOR 1046545. S2CID 145609412.
  74. ^ Cathryn Jo Rosen; John S. Goldkamp (Bound 1989). "The Constitutionality of Drug Testing at the Bail Stage". The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. fourscore (1): 114–176. doi:x.2307/1143765. JSTOR 1143765. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  75. ^ Lennart E. Henriksson (June 1991). "The Unconvincing Case for Drug Testing". Canadian Public Policy. 17 (2): 183–196. doi:10.2307/3551028. JSTOR 3551028.
  76. ^ Deborah F. Crown; Joseph G. Rosse (Fall 1988). "A Critical Review of the Assumptions Underlying Drug Testing". Periodical of Business and Psychology. 3 (1): 22–41. doi:10.1007/BF01016746. S2CID 143525716. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors listing (link)
  77. ^ "Employee Drug Testing Written report" (PDF). Global Drug Policy.
  78. ^ "EAP Employee and Supervisor Drug Education" (PDF). USUHS.mil.
  79. ^ "Substance Abuse in the hospitality industry". Arkansas Modest Concern Development Center. Archived from the original on Feb sixteen, 2009.
  80. ^ "Roadside drug testing". www.adf.org.au. Alcohol and Drug Foundation. Retrieved July xviii, 2015.
  81. ^ Knowles, Lorna; Branley (February 2, 2016). "Acquittal of man caught drug-driving ix days after smoking cannabis throws NSW drug laws into doubt". abc.net.au. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved February two, 2016. A spokeswoman for NSW Roads Minister Duncan Gay said roadside tests were followed up with lab tests and 97 per cent of tests matched. She said the research they had indicated drugs were only detected in a person's saliva for 12 hours after being ingested.
  82. ^ 18 United statesC. § 3565(b)(5)
  83. ^ 18 U.S.C. § 3583(m)(3)
  84. ^ Holland, Peter. "Instance-Study. Drug Testing in the Australian Mining Industry" (PDF). Surveillance & Society: 204–9. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 28, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2010.
  85. ^ "White Sox Players Almost Refused Drug Test". Los Angeles Times. Associated Printing. March 12, 2003.
  86. ^ Voyles, Karen (October 6, 2006). "Library volunteers just say no to drug testing". Gainesville Sun.
  87. ^ "Iranian weightlifters refuse drug testing". February 16, 2010.

External links [edit]

  • National Plant on Drug Abuse

holmeswonean56.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_test

0 Response to "How to Read a Icup Drug Test"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel